Faye Bramley
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 10 runners a season, across both codes, winning with 14% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.16). The yard is quiet just now — 1 winner in the last fortnight, below its own baseline.
Runners with a claiming rider up have been a poor signal at 6.7% (n=45, Fair A/E 0.55). Right now the yard is in a quiet spell: 1 from 19 runners in the last 14 days (5.3%, 8.9pts below the 14.2% baseline). Harry Cobden rides 19% of the entries and beats the yard's average (25.9% vs 14.2%, A/E 1.29) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well on Good to Firm going (22.6%, n=31) and in Class 4 (19.7%, n=76). The record reads poorly off a 61-180-day break — 7.5% over 40 runners, 6.7pts below the baseline. 2 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Support The Hunt Family Fund December Gold Cup Handicap Chase at Cheltenham (Dec 2025, £71,188).
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 14.2% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 14.2% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Quiet spellWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2025→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 282 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 282 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 21 March 2025 to 3 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 7 Oct 2026: the KTB Selection in 4 runs (won 1) · top-rated on KTB Rating in 1 run (won 0) · fastest on KTB Speed in 1 run (won 0) · to 1 Nov 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Faye Bramley's strike rate?
- Faye Bramley has won 40 of 282 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 14.2% (as at 4 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Who rides most for Faye Bramley?
- Harry Cobden, with 54 runners since 2008 — 19% of the total. That pairing has won 14 (25.9%).
- Is Faye Bramley in form?
- In the last 14 days: 19 runners, 1 winner, a strike rate of 5.3%. That is below the baseline of 14.2% since 2008.
- What is Faye Bramley's Fair A/E?
- 1.16, from 281 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.