Lucy Wadham
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 150 runners a season, winning with 15% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.12). New recruits from other yards win at 17% first time out (79 runs).
The record is strongest at Fakenham (28.3%, n=244), clear of the yard's 14.6% baseline. It is weakest at Aintree (2.9% over 34 runners) — the widest gap in the record. In Group and Graded company the record reads poorly at 6.1% (n=212, Fair A/E 0.72). Leighton Aspell rides 20% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (14.1%, A/E 0.99) — the market has that partnership priced right. The yard also reads well off a 0-7-day break (32.5%, n=40). The record reads poorly in Class 1 — 6.1% over 246 runners, 8.5pts below the baseline. 14 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Midnite All-Weather Easter Classic Middle Distance Handicap at Newcastle (AW) (Apr 2026, £90,195). The stable star of the record: Eleazar (GER) — 10 wins from 34 runs for the yard.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 14.6% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 14.6% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 3,218 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 3,218 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 2 January 2005 to 3 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Lucy Wadham's strike rate?
- Lucy Wadham has won 424 of 2,904 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 14.6% (as at 5 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Lucy Wadham do best at?
- Fakenham by strike rate: 69 wins from 244 runners (28.3%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Lucy Wadham?
- Leighton Aspell, with 587 runners since 2008 — 20% of the total. That pairing has won 83 (14.1%).
- Is Lucy Wadham in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 2 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Lucy Wadham's Fair A/E?
- 1.12, from 2,892 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.