Sabrina J Harty
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 50 runners a season, across both codes, winning with 7% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.07).
The record is strongest at Roscommon (14.7%, n=34) and Curragh (12.9%, n=85) — all clear of the yard's 6.5% baseline. New recruits from other stables on their first run struggle at 0% (n=34, Fair A/E 0.00). Leigh Roche rides 9% of the entries and edges the yard's average (9.2% vs 6.5%, A/E 1.23) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well on Good to Firm going (11.7%, n=120). The record reads poorly off a break of 180+ days — 0% over 82 runners, 6.5pts below the baseline. 5 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Eventus Marquees Champion 4yo Hurdle at Punchestown (Apr 2008, £68,200). The stable star of the record: Have A Nice Day (GB) — 8 wins from 59 runs for the yard.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 6.5% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 6.5% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 1,034 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 1,034 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 23 January 2005 to 1 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 1 Nov 2026: the KTB Selection in 1 run (won 0) · to 1 Nov 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Sabrina J Harty's strike rate?
- Sabrina J Harty has won 62 of 949 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 6.5% (as at 15 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Sabrina J Harty do best at?
- Roscommon by strike rate: 5 wins from 34 runners (14.7%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Sabrina J Harty?
- Leigh Roche, with 87 runners since 2008 — 9% of the total. That pairing has won 8 (9.2%).
- What is Sabrina J Harty's Fair A/E?
- 1.07, from 947 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.