Nick Scholfield
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 10 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 13% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.91). The yard is quiet just now — 0 winners in the last fortnight, below its own baseline.
Horses returning fresh after 61+ days have been a poor signal at 5.4% (n=37, Fair A/E 0.43). Right now the yard is in a quiet spell: 0 from 17 runners in the last 14 days (0%, 13.3pts below the 13.3% baseline). Harry Reed rides 20% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (13.2%, A/E 1.17) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well off a 15-30-day break (18.2%, n=99) and beyond 3m (18.9%, n=37). The record reads poorly off a 31-60-day break — 6.8% over 44 runners, 6.5pts below the baseline. One Group or Graded win sits in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the BetWright Herring Queen Series Final Mares' Novices' Handicap Hurdle at Kelso (Mar 2026, £51,440). The stable star of the record: Morning Mayhem (GB) — 5 wins from 19 runs for the yard.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 13.3% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 13.3% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Quiet spellWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2025→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 271 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 271 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 6 November 2025 to 5 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 7 Oct 2026: the KTB Selection in 4 runs (won 0) · top-rated on KTB Rating in 6 runs (won 0) · fastest on KTB Speed in 4 runs (won 0) · to 1 Nov 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Nick Scholfield's strike rate?
- Nick Scholfield has won 36 of 271 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 13.3% (as at 6 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Who rides most for Nick Scholfield?
- Harry Reed, with 53 runners since 2008 — 20% of the total. That pairing has won 7 (13.2%).
- Is Nick Scholfield in form?
- In the last 14 days: 17 runners, 0 winners, a strike rate of 0%. That is below the baseline of 13.3% since 2008.
- What is Nick Scholfield's Fair A/E?
- 0.91, from 270 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.