Skip to content
Trainer profile

P. Charalambous & J. Clutterbuck

389 runners in the last 5 seasons · 46 individual horses
As at 1 Nov 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner 13 days ago 97% of runners on the flat
from 1 Jan 2022
23–389
Wins / Runs
5.9%
Strike rate
n=389
78 (20%)
Placed
0.72
n=385 · 0.61 incl. margin
−202.87
£1 level stake
n=389 at SP · −52.2%
£617k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
5.6%
KTB Yard Profile

Sends out around 80 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 6% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 0.72). With a claiming rider up the record reads 10% (49 runs).

Deterministic profile computed from 389 archived runs (last 5 seasons) · updated 1 Nov 2026
KTB at a glance Luke Morris: 6.8% from 103 Claiming riders: 10.2%
The read

The record is strongest at Lingfield (AW) (11.4%, n=35), clear of the yard's 5.9% baseline. Runners with a claiming rider up have been a positive signal at 10.2% (n=49, Fair A/E 1.47). Luke Morris rides 26% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (6.8%, A/E 0.69). The yard also reads well off a 0-7-day break (14.7%, n=34) and at trips under 6f (10.8%, n=74). The record reads poorly on Good going — 0% over 51 runners, 5.9pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the yard over 1m – 1m1f: Fair A/E 0.29 across 65 runners (1.5% strike, −44.00 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies. One Group or Graded win sits in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the John Guest Racing Bengough Stakes at Ascot (Oct 2024, £48,204). The stable star of the record: Man On A Mission (GB) — 7 wins from 59 runs for the yard.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 5.9% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
3.6%−2.3
n=55 · A/E 0.53 · £1 −41.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
0%−5.9
n=26 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −26.00
Debutants · first career start
0%−5.9
n=20 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −20.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
0%−5.9
n=16 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −16.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
3.3%−2.6
n=30 · A/E 0.62 · £1 −24.50
When favourite
18.2%
n=22 · A/E 0.61 · £1 −10.07
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
10.2%+4.3
n=49 · A/E 1.47 · £1 −0.90
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
11.1%+5.2
n=9 · A/E 0.88 · £1 +0.50

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 5.9% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
Off a 0-7-day break 14.7% vs 5.9% · n=34
On Good going 0% vs 5.9% · n=51
In Class 4 0% vs 5.9% · n=37
At trips under 6f 10.8% vs 5.9% · n=74
At Lingfield (AW) 11.4% vs 5.9% · n=35
Over 1m – 1m1f 1.5% vs 5.9% · n=65
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Flat 376 23 6.1% −189.87
Hurdle 9 0 0% −9.00
NH Flat 4 0 0% −4.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 226 17 7.5% −105.37
Good to Firm 58 2 3.4% −41.50
Good 51 0 0% −51.00
Soft 23 2 8.7% +7.50
Good to Soft 21 1 4.8% −8.00
Heavy 7 0 0% −7.00
Firm 3 1 33.3% +2.50

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Chelmsford City (AW) 71 5 7% −22.50
Southwell (AW) 45 3 6.7% −30.20
Yarmouth 43 3 7% −2.50
Kempton (AW) 39 3 7.7% −10.67
Lingfield (AW) 35 4 11.4% −14.50
Wolverhampton (AW) 35 2 5.7% −26.50
Newmarket 12 0 0% −12.00
Newmarket 10 0 0% −10.00
Leicester 10 0 0% −10.00
Doncaster 7 0 0% −7.00
Brighton 6 0 0% −6.00
Ascot 6 1 16.7% +3.50
Beverley 6 1 16.7% +4.00
York 6 0 0% −6.00
Lingfield 5 0 0% −5.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 6 230 18 7.8% −73.20
Class 5 78 3 3.8% −62.50
Class 4 37 0 0% −37.00
Class 2 31 1 3.2% −26.67
Class 1 9 1 11.1% +0.50
Class 3 4 0 0% −4.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 31 4 12.9% 0.46 −19.07
2nd–3rd fav 58 8 13.8% 0.88 −19.30
4th–6th fav 134 9 6.7% 0.94 −25.50
7th+ in betting 166 2 1.2% 0.43 −139.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Apollo One (GB)from Peter Charalambous 36 2 18 10 Oct 26
Match Anthem (IRE)then Glen Braem 26 2 9 26 Nov 25
Lord Danielson (GB) 22 2 4 30 Jul 25
Alpha King (GB)from Peter Charalambous · then Glen Braem 20 1 2 9 Aug 23
Albert Cee (FR)from James Owen 16 2 4 19 Oct 26
Sunny Time (GB) 15 1 3 26 Jun 25
Starshot (IRE)from Jessica Bedi · then Lawrence Mullaney 13 0 2 14 Mar 25
Global Resolve (IRE) 12 0 1 30 Apr 25
Twilight Jazz (GB)from Michael Appleby · then Mike Sowersby 12 1 4 13 Sep 24
Martini Lodge (GB) 12 0 0 21 Feb 24
Point Of Fact (GB)from H-F Devin 11 0 0 29 Feb 24
All 46 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 46 horses listed, 26 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from Peter Charalambous (5) and Alice Haynes (3); 20 had their first archived run for this yard.

9 have since run for another yard, most often for Glen Braem (3); 37 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
0 from 1
Only 1 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
184053250361614
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
Go-to riderLuke Morris
26% of all rides
6.8% SR · A/E 0.69
RiderRWSR£1
Luke Morris 103 7 6.8% −62.75
Dylan Hogan 31 3 9.7% −2.55
George Wood 30 2 6.7% −9.50
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2022→
23
Archived wins
1
Pattern / graded wins
£617k
Prize money
2024
Best season · 7 wins
Apollo One (GB) — John Guest Racing Bengough Stakes (Group 3) Ascot · Oct 2024 · Group 3
£48,204
Apollo One (GB) — Unibet London Sprint Series (Final) Handicap Kempton (AW) · Nov 2022 · Class 2
£41,232
Man On A Mission (GB) — Unibet Support Safe Gambling Handicap (Div 2) Kempton (AW) · Feb 2024 · Class 6
£7,851

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Swiss Spirit (GB) 11.9% · 7–59
Progeny have won 9.5% of 3,646 runs since 2008 (243 horses). Weakest on Soft going: 4.5% from 244. Weakest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 3.7% from 136.
Equiano (FR) 5.6% · 2–36
Progeny have won 9.1% of 7,540 runs since 2008 (549 horses).
Muhaarar (GB) 0% · 0–26
Progeny have won 11.6% of 4,810 runs since 2008 (414 horses).
Soldier's Call (GB) 7.7% · 2–26
Progeny have won 9.1% of 2,117 runs since 2008 (217 horses). Strongest on Good to Soft going: 13.6% from 199. Weakest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 4.1% from 246.
Iffraaj (GB) 9.1% · 2–22
Progeny have won 10.5% of 13,978 runs since 2008 (1,092 horses).
Kingman (GB) 5% · 1–20
Progeny have won 14.6% of 7,510 runs since 2008 (777 horses). Weakest on Soft going: 11.1% from 965. Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 9% from 122.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 1 Nov 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 389 · newest first

The latest 50 of 389 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 21 April 2022 to 19 October 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
25 Jul 26 York Apollo One (GB)J: Daniel Tudhope Sky Bet Dash (Class 2 Heritage Handicap)Class 2 · 6f · Good To Firm · 21 ran 10th 10/1
03 Jul 26 Sandown Special Ghaiyyath (IRE)J: Rose Dawes Debenhams HandicapClass 4 · 8f · Good · 10 ran 9th 80/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is P. Charalambous & J. Clutterbuck's strike rate?
P. Charalambous & J. Clutterbuck has won 23 of 389 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 5.9% (as at 1 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does P. Charalambous & J. Clutterbuck do best at?
Lingfield (AW) by strike rate: 4 wins from 35 runners (11.4%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Who rides most for P. Charalambous & J. Clutterbuck?
Luke Morris, with 103 runners since 2022 — 26% of the total. That pairing has won 7 (6.8%).
Is P. Charalambous & J. Clutterbuck in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 1 runner, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is P. Charalambous & J. Clutterbuck's Fair A/E?
0.72, from 385 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 1 November 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).