Stephen Thorne
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 20 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 14% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.03). With a claiming rider up the record reads 16% (209 runs).
The record is strongest at Dundalk (AW) (21.4%, n=154), clear of the yard's 13.8% baseline. It is weakest at Curragh (5% over 40 runners) — the widest gap in the record. New recruits from other stables on their first run struggle at 5.6% (n=36, Fair A/E 0.46). Jack Kearney rides 55% of the entries and edges the yard's average (17% vs 13.8%, A/E 1.22) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well on Standard (AW) going (21%, n=157). The record reads poorly on Soft going — 5% over 60 runners, 8.8pts below the baseline. One Group or Graded win sits in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Hong Kong Jockey Club World Pool Autumn Fillies Handicap at Leopardstown (Sep 2025, £59,000).
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 13.8% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 13.8% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerGoing
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2024→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 333 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 333 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 17 October 2024 to 28 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 7 Oct 2026: the KTB Selection in 2 runs (won 1) · top-rated on KTB Rating in 2 runs (won 1) · fastest on KTB Speed in 1 run (won 1) · to 28 Oct 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Stephen Thorne's strike rate?
- Stephen Thorne has won 46 of 333 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 13.8% (as at 30 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Stephen Thorne do best at?
- Dundalk (AW) by strike rate: 33 wins from 154 runners (21.4%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Stephen Thorne?
- Jack Kearney, with 182 runners since 2008 — 55% of the total. That pairing has won 31 (17%).
- Is Stephen Thorne in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 8 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Stephen Thorne's Fair A/E?
- 1.03, from 333 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.