Skip to content
Trainer profile

Thomas Faulkner

362 runners in the last 5 seasons · 51 individual horses
As at 19 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Non-runners: 14.6% of 206 declared in the last 365 days, counting all recorded withdrawals, including reserves. For context, a typical day across all racing ends with about 6.5% withdrawn (middle half 5.3–8.1% over 364 racing days). As at 19 Oct 2026.
Last runner 4 days ago
from 1 Jan 2022
35–362
Wins / Runs
9.7%
Strike rate
n=362
87 (24%)
Placed
1.07
n=362 · 0.91 incl. margin
+39.24
£1 level stake
n=362 at SP · +10.8%
£260k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
11.9%
KTB Yard Profile

Sends out around 70 runners a season, winning with 10% of them — beating the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 1.07).

Deterministic profile computed from 362 archived runs (last 5 seasons) · updated 19 Oct 2026
KTB at a glance Fresh horses: 10% Robert Havlin: 10.8% from 83 Claiming riders: 9.9%
The read

The record is strongest at Wolverhampton (AW) (15.2%, n=145), clear of the yard's 9.7% baseline. Runners with a claiming rider up are the standout value angle: 9.9% strikes only just above baseline, but Fair A/E 1.22 and +41.50 to a £1 stake over 121 runners — a record the market has persistently underpriced. Robert Havlin rides 23% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (10.8%, A/E 0.99) — the market has that partnership priced right. The yard also reads well over 1m – 1m1f (17%, n=106) and off a 31-60-day break (15.2%, n=79). The record reads poorly in Class 4 — 2.4% over 41 runners, 7.3pts below the baseline. The stable star of the record: Prince Ali (GB) — 5 wins from 21 runs for the yard.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 9.7% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
10%+0.3
n=80 · A/E 1.34 · £1 −8.17
New recruits · first run for the yard
8.5%−1.2
n=47 · A/E 1.11 · £1 +51.33
Debutants · first career start
0%−9.7
n=5 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −5.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
0%−9.7
n=4 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −4.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
10.7%+1.0
n=28 · A/E 1.63 · £1 +69.00
When favourite
30%
n=20 · A/E 0.97 · £1 −4.09
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
9.9%+0.2
n=121 · A/E 1.22 · £1 +41.50

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 9.7% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
Over 1m – 1m1f 17% vs 9.7% · n=106
On last-time-out winners 18.2% vs 9.7% · n=33
At Wolverhampton (AW) 15.2% vs 9.7% · n=145
In Class 4 2.4% vs 9.7% · n=41
Off a 31-60-day break 15.2% vs 9.7% · n=79
With C&D winners 14.7% vs 9.7% · n=102
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Flat 321 34 10.6% +77.62
Hurdle 27 0 0% −27.00
Chase 12 1 8.3% −9.38
NH Flat 2 0 0% −2.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 217 26 12% +108.62
Good 56 4 7.1% −35.38
Good to Soft 32 1 3.1% −21.00
Soft 29 2 6.9% −1.00
Good to Firm 18 2 11.1% −2.00
Heavy 10 0 0% −10.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Wolverhampton (AW) 145 22 15.2% +162.24
Chepstow 55 3 5.5% −19.00
Kempton (AW) 27 0 0% −27.00
Ffos Las 25 4 16% −0.88
Southwell (AW) 19 3 15.8% −5.62
Lingfield (AW) 17 0 0% −17.00
Bath 13 0 0% −13.00
Newcastle (AW) 7 0 0% −7.00
Hereford 6 0 0% −6.00
Uttoxeter 5 0 0% −5.00
Windsor 5 0 0% −5.00
Ascot 5 1 20% +5.00
Doncaster 5 0 0% −5.00
Nottingham 5 1 20% +0.50
Taunton 4 0 0% −4.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 6 213 27 12.7% +136.12
Class 5 99 7 7.1% −56.88
Class 4 41 1 2.4% −31.00
Class 2 5 0 0% −5.00
Class 3 4 0 0% −4.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 24 7 29.2% 1.01 −4.09
2nd–3rd fav 75 14 18.7% 1.19 +5.83
4th–6th fav 126 9 7.1% 0.89 −20.50
7th+ in betting 137 5 3.6% 1.27 +58.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Prince Ali (GB)from Deborah Faulkner 21 5 6 27 Sep 26
V Power (GB)from Deborah Faulkner 20 3 7 11 Oct 26
Desiderata (IRE)from Ryan Potter 19 3 9 15 Oct 26
Serious Look (IRE)from Deborah Faulkner 17 4 7 11 Sep 26
Golden Flame (IRE)from Deborah Faulkner · then T Faulkner 16 1 6 9 Jul 26
Tiger Beetle (GB)from Mark Rimell 14 1 3 2 Oct 26
First Greyed (IRE)from Michael Dods 13 4 4 2 Feb 26
El Bufalo (GB)from Dylan Cunha 12 2 5 29 Jun 26
Northcliff (IRE)from Michael Keady · then Ross Burdon 12 2 3 29 May 26
Fifty Sent (GB)from Sam England 11 3 4 17 Jun 26
All 51 horses sent out in this window. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 51 horses listed, 46 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from Deborah Faulkner (22) and Michael Dods (3); 5 had their first archived run for this yard.

6 have since run for another yard, most often for Ross Burdon (2); 45 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
0 from 3
Only 3 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
120192215713551107
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
Go-to riderRobert Havlin
23% of all rides
10.8% SR · A/E 0.99
RiderRWSR£1
Robert Havlin 83 9 10.8% +24.12
Zoe Lewis 78 10 12.8% +66.50
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2024→
35
Archived wins
£260k
Prize money
2026
Best season · 16 wins
Northcliff (IRE) — Peroni Nastro Azzurro 0.0% Blue Ribbon Handicap (Div 1) Ascot · May 2025 · Class 4
£11,515
First Greyed (IRE) — Midnite: Built For 2025 Not 2005 Handicap Wolverhampton (AW) · Dec 2025 · Class 5
£5,234
El Bufalo (GB) — Midnite Are Upping The Betting Game Handicap Wolverhampton (AW) · Dec 2025 · Class 5
£5,234

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Dandy Man (IRE) 11.5% · 3–26
Progeny have won 9.1% of 14,911 runs since 2008 (930 horses). Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 5.3% from 170.
Twilight Son (GB) 23.8% · 5–21
Progeny have won 9.6% of 3,638 runs since 2008 (281 horses). Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 12.6% from 613.
Golden Horn (GB) 5% · 1–20
Progeny have won 13.8% of 3,730 runs since 2008 (345 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 9.3% from 161. Weakest over 6f – 7f (all codes): 8.2% from 232.
Protectionist (GER) 15% · 3–20
Progeny have won 13.3% of 323 runs since 2008 (42 horses). Weakest over 1m2f – 1m4f (all codes): 8.5% from 106.
Vadamos (FR) 15.8% · 3–19
Progeny have won 9.6% of 2,081 runs since 2008 (217 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 5.2% from 155.
Dark Angel (IRE) 23.5% · 4–17
Progeny have won 11.3% of 21,868 runs since 2008 (1,594 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 15% from 107.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 19 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 362 · newest first

The latest 50 of 362 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 15 August 2024 to 15 October 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
31 Aug 26 Chepstow Prince Ali (GB)J: Zoe Lewis Runtech Ltd Handicap Stakes (Div I)Class 6 · 7f · Good To Soft · 11 ran 1st 10/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Thomas Faulkner's strike rate?
Thomas Faulkner has won 35 of 362 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 9.7% (as at 19 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Thomas Faulkner do best at?
Wolverhampton (AW) by strike rate: 22 wins from 145 runners (15.2%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Who rides most for Thomas Faulkner?
Robert Havlin, with 83 runners since 2022 — 23% of the total. That pairing has won 9 (10.8%).
Is Thomas Faulkner in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 3 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is Thomas Faulkner's Fair A/E?
1.07, from 362 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 19 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).