Mrs Denise Foster
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 90 runners a season, across both codes, winning with 7% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.93). New recruits from other yards win at 13% first time out (218 runs).
The record is strongest at Downpatrick (16%, n=50) and Down Royal (13.1%, n=61) — all clear of the yard's 6.6% baseline. New recruits from other stables on their first run win at 12.8% (n=218, Fair A/E 1.12), but debutants struggle at 2.4% (n=127, Fair A/E 0.48). The market has consistently overbet in Group and Graded company the record: 5.3% strike, Fair A/E 0.62 and −64.06 to a £1 stake over 133 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Jordan Gainford rides 8% of the entries and edges the yard's average (10.8% vs 6.6%, A/E 0.90). The record reads poorly over 6f – 7f — 1.6% over 129 runners, 5pts below the baseline. 7 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Betway Aintree Hurdle at Aintree (Apr 2021, £104,984). The stable star of the record: Tipped Up Harry (GB) — 7 wins from 44 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Feb–Mar.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 6.6% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 6.6% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 1,736 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 1,736 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 19 January 2005 to 4 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Mrs Denise Foster's strike rate?
- Mrs Denise Foster has won 110 of 1,663 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 6.6% (as at 14 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Mrs Denise Foster do best at?
- Down Royal by strike rate: 8 wins from 61 runners (13.1%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Mrs Denise Foster?
- Jordan Gainford, with 139 runners since 2008 — 8% of the total. That pairing has won 15 (10.8%).
- Is Mrs Denise Foster in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 3 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Mrs Denise Foster's Fair A/E?
- 0.93, from 1,662 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.