James Horton
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 30 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 10% of them — level with the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.99).
The record is strongest at Wolverhampton (AW) (18.6%, n=59), clear of the yard's 10.4% baseline. It is weakest at Chelmsford (AW) (2.7% over 37 runners) — the widest gap in the record. In Group and Graded company the record reads poorly at 2.6% (n=38, Fair A/E 0.35). P J McDonald rides 29% of the entries and edges the yard's average (13.5% vs 10.4%, A/E 1.08) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The record reads poorly in Class 1 — 2.6% over 38 runners, 7.8pts below the baseline. One Group or Graded win sits in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Sky Bet Finale Handicap at York (Aug 2022, £41,232). The stable star of the record: Grandlad (IRE) — 6 wins from 29 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Apr–Jun.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 10.4% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 10.4% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerGoing
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2022→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 661 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 661 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 25 March 2022 to 3 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 9 Oct 2026: the KTB Selection in 1 run (won 0) · fastest on KTB Speed in 2 runs (won 1) · to 3 Nov 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is James Horton's strike rate?
- James Horton has won 69 of 661 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 10.4% (as at 5 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does James Horton do best at?
- Wolverhampton (AW) by strike rate: 11 wins from 59 runners (18.6%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for James Horton?
- P J McDonald, with 192 runners since 2008 — 29% of the total. That pairing has won 26 (13.5%).
- Is James Horton in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 5 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is James Horton's Fair A/E?
- 0.99, from 660 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.