M J Tynan
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 10 runners a season, across both codes, winning with 5% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.11). With a claiming rider up the record reads 8% (157 runs).
Debutants struggle at 0% (n=33, Fair A/E 0.00). Runners with a claiming rider up are the standout value angle: 8.3% strikes only just above baseline, but Fair A/E 1.56 and +6.06 to a £1 stake over 157 runners — a record the market has persistently underpriced. The yard also reads well on Standard (AW) going (11.9%, n=67) and at trips under 6f (11.1%, n=45). The record reads poorly over 1m5f – 2m — 0% over 49 runners, 5.4pts below the baseline. One Group or Graded win sits in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Paddy's Rewards Club EBF Novice Hurdle at Cork (Oct 2021, £16,225). The stable star of the record: Maontri (IRE) — 6 wins from 31 runs for the yard.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 5.4% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 5.4% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 314 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 314 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 9 January 2005 to 4 November 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 4 Nov 2026: the KTB Selection in 1 run (won 0) · to 4 Nov 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is M J Tynan's strike rate?
- M J Tynan has won 15 of 280 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 5.4% (as at 9 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does M J Tynan do best at?
- Dundalk (AW) by strike rate: 5 wins from 61 runners (8.2%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Is M J Tynan in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 1 runner, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is M J Tynan's Fair A/E?
- 1.11, from 280 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.