Charlie Mann
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sent out around 160 runners a season, almost all over hurdles and fences, winning with 14% of them — beating the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.10). Horses with headgear back on after a bare run strike at 18% (63 runs).
The record is strongest at Lingfield (29%, n=31) and Plumpton (24.5%, n=94) — all clear of the yard's 13.8% baseline. It is weakest at Aintree (0% over 43 runners) — the widest gap in the record. A horse having headgear put back on after a bare run has been a positive signal at 17.5% (n=63, Fair A/E 1.61), but in Group and Graded company the record reads poorly at 5.8% (n=69, Fair A/E 0.96). Runners with a claiming rider up are the standout value angle: 13.6% strikes only just below baseline, but Fair A/E 1.15 and +23.91 to a £1 stake over 588 runners — a record the market has persistently underpriced. Noel Fehily rode 29% of the entries and edges the yard's average (17.9% vs 13.8%, A/E 1.15) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also read well on Standard (AW) going (25.4%, n=59). The record read poorly in Class 1 — 4.7% over 128 runners, 9.1pts below the baseline. 5 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Ellier Developments Champion Novice Chase at Punchestown (Apr 2008, £68,200). The stable star of the record was Fine Parchment (IRE) — 8 wins from 42 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fired Mar–Jun.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 13.8% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 13.8% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Jumping record
completion over obstacles · same window as headerHorses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 2,864 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 2,864 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 2 January 2005 to 18 April 2021.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Charlie Mann's strike rate?
- Charlie Mann has won 313 of 2,272 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 13.8% (as at 15 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Charlie Mann do best at?
- Plumpton by strike rate: 23 wins from 94 runners (24.5%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Charlie Mann?
- Noel Fehily, with 653 runners since 2008 — 29% of the total. That pairing has won 117 (17.9%).
- What is Charlie Mann's Fair A/E?
- 1.10, from 2,270 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.