Marcus Tregoning
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 160 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 13% of them — level with the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.01). Horses in first-time headgear strike at 15% (183 runs, true-first definition).
The record is strongest at Bath (21.4%, n=159), clear of the yard's 12.5% baseline. A horse having headgear put back on after a bare run has been a poor signal at 4.4% (n=45, Fair A/E 0.38). A horse in first-time headgear are the standout value angle: 15.3% strikes only just above baseline, but Fair A/E 1.36 and +82.25 to a £1 stake over 183 runners — a record the market has persistently underpriced. The market has consistently overbet debutants: 4.6% strike, Fair A/E 0.74 and −158.75 to a £1 stake over 371 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Martin Dwyer rides 13% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (12.3%, A/E 1.00) — the market has that partnership priced right. The yard also reads well on Firm going (33.9%, n=62) and over 1m5f – 2m (19.1%, n=230). 29 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Vodafone Derby Stakes at Epsom Downs (Jun 2006, £740,695). The stable star of the record: Bronze Angel (IRE) — 8 wins from 53 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Aug–Sep.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 12.5% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 12.5% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 3,700 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 3,700 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 29 January 2005 to 22 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Marcus Tregoning's strike rate?
- Marcus Tregoning has won 374 of 3,001 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 12.5% (as at 27 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Marcus Tregoning do best at?
- Bath by strike rate: 34 wins from 159 runners (21.4%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Marcus Tregoning?
- Martin Dwyer, with 397 runners since 2008 — 13% of the total. That pairing has won 49 (12.3%).
- Is Marcus Tregoning in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 5 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Marcus Tregoning's Fair A/E?
- 1.01, from 2,989 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.