Skip to content
Trainer profile

Peter Chapple-Hyam

364 runners in the last 5 seasons · 73 individual horses
As at 22 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner yesterday 100% of runners on the flat
from 1 Jan 2022
44–364
Wins / Runs
12.1%
Strike rate
n=364
100 (28%)
Placed
1.13
n=362 · 0.95 incl. margin
−45.89
£1 level stake
n=364 at SP · −12.6%
£520k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
7.6%
KTB Yard Profile

Sends out around 70 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 12% of them — beating the margin-free market read across five seasons (Fair A/E 1.13).

Deterministic profile computed from 364 archived runs (last 5 seasons) · updated 22 Oct 2026
KTB at a glance Fires Aug–Oct 32.6% when favourite Sends off the favourite in 12% of races
The read

It is weakest at Newmarket (3.3% over 30 runners) — the widest gap in the record. Debutants struggle at 4.3% (n=46, Fair A/E 0.55). The yard also reads well on Good to Soft going (24.4%, n=41) and off a 15-30-day break (19.1%, n=115). The market has also underrated the yard in Class 4: Fair A/E 1.84 across 105 runners (18.1% strike, +85.88 to a £1 stake). The record reads poorly in Class 2 — 0% over 46 runners, 12.1pts below the baseline. 38 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Vodafone Derby Stakes at Epsom Downs (Jun 2007, £709,750). The stable star of the record: Buckstay (IRE) — 5 wins from 35 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Aug–Oct.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 12.1% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
9.7%−2.4
n=72 · A/E 1.03 · £1 −35.87
New recruits · first run for the yard
11.1%−1.0
n=18 · A/E 1.30 · £1 −1.50
Debutants · first career start
4.3%−7.8
n=46 · A/E 0.55 · £1 −30.75
First-time headgear · true-first definition
5.9%−6.2
n=17 · A/E 0.61 · £1 −9.00
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
25%+12.9
n=4 · A/E 2.03 · £1 +0.50
When favourite
32.6%
n=43 · A/E 1.04 · £1 −5.54
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
9.1%−3.0
n=66 · A/E 0.87 · £1 +7.38
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−12.1
n=16 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −16.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 12.1% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
In Class 2 0% vs 12.1% · n=46
On Good to Soft going 24.4% vs 12.1% · n=41
Off a 15-30-day break 19.1% vs 12.1% · n=115
At Newmarket 3.3% vs 12.1% · n=30
With debutants 4.3% vs 12.1% · n=46
In Class 4 18.1% vs 12.1% · n=105
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 116 13 11.2% −50.03
Good 78 6 7.7% +1.50
Good to Firm 70 5 7.1% −40.54
Good to Soft 41 10 24.4% +6.33
Soft 39 7 17.9% +34.75
Heavy 19 3 15.8% +3.10
Firm 1 0 0% −1.00

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Kempton (AW) 35 2 5.7% −30.55
Newmarket 30 1 3.3% −25.00
Newbury 27 1 3.7% −18.50
Newmarket 24 1 4.2% −18.50
Yarmouth 23 5 21.7% −3.54
Chelmsford City (AW) 22 3 13.6% −7.64
Lingfield (AW) 20 2 10% −9.00
Newcastle (AW) 18 3 16.7% −3.25
Leicester 16 2 12.5% +30.00
Doncaster 15 3 20% +4.88
Sandown 14 5 35.7% +56.00
Ascot 13 1 7.7% +0.00
Windsor 13 1 7.7% −7.50
Southwell (AW) 12 2 16.7% −1.59
Nottingham 11 3 27.3% +20.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 4 105 19 18.1% +85.88
Class 5 99 13 13.1% −36.29
Class 6 61 8 13.1% −22.68
Class 2 46 0 0% −46.00
Class 3 31 2 6.5% −10.50
Class 1 16 0 0% −16.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 50 16 32% 1.08 −3.29
2nd–3rd fav 73 16 21.9% 1.38 +44.90
4th–6th fav 115 10 8.7% 1.17 +14.50
7th+ in betting 126 2 1.6% 0.50 −102.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Rogue Encore (GB)from Tom Clover 20 3 5 16 Oct 26
Desperate Dan (IRE) 17 3 6 16 Oct 26
Queen Of Atlantis (GB)from James Ferguson 14 3 6 17 Nov 25
Photosynthesis (IRE)from Tom Clover 12 1 4 22 Aug 26
Charming Fellow (GB)then Joe Ponting 11 1 3 23 Oct 25
Loz Vegas (IRE) 10 2 3 10 Oct 26
Kathleen Mary (GB)then Gihan Arnolda 10 0 2 11 Mar 26
North View (GB)then George Boughey 10 2 6 25 Sep 24
Blake (GB)then Noel Meade 9 2 4 11 Oct 24
Tenison (GB) 8 1 2 14 Oct 26
Alfred (FR)then George Boughey 8 1 2 14 Oct 23
Showing the 60 most-raced of the 73 horses sent out in this window — each ran at least 2 times. Horses with fewer runs aren't listed; search finds any horse since 2005. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 60 horses listed, 18 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from Tom Clover (5) and Kevin Philippart De Foy (2); 42 had their first archived run for this yard.

30 have since run for another yard, most often for Kevin Philippart De Foy (3) and George Boughey (2); 30 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

Current form

significance-gated

Last 14 days

Small sample
1 from 6
Only 6 runners in the last 14 days — too few to read against the baseline (gate: n≥15). The card states the sample and stays neutral.

When the yard fires

strike by month, 5 seasons
JFMAMJJASOND
2207714610151414169
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
12% of all rides
13.6% SR · A/E 1.58
RiderRWSR£1
Callum Hutchinson 44 6 13.6% +29.38
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2005→
383
Archived wins
38
Pattern / graded wins
£7.47m
Prize money
2006
Best season · 41 wins
In our archive from its very first year (2005), so this career almost certainly began earlier than our record does. The figures above count 2005 onwards only — what the archive holds, not a full-career total. This card is the full archive census (2005→); the statistics in the header aggregate from 2008 — the floor that guarantees every horse a complete captured career — so this card can legitimately show more wins than the header.
Authorized (IRE) — Vodafone Derby Stakes (Group 1) Epsom Downs · Jun 2007 · Group 1
£709,750
Authorized (IRE) — Juddmonte International Stakes (Group 1) York · Aug 2007 · Group 1
£298,095
Dutch Art (GB) — Darley Prix Morny (Colts & Fillies) Deauville (FR) · Aug 2006 · Group 1
£137,924

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Aclaim (IRE) 8.8% · 3–34
Progeny have won 10% of 2,531 runs since 2008 (201 horses). Weakest over 1m – 1m1f (all codes): 6.7% from 386.
Advertise (GB) 10% · 3–30
Progeny have won 9.7% of 1,540 runs since 2008 (151 horses).
Kodiac (GB) 15% · 3–20
Progeny have won 10.4% of 23,541 runs since 2008 (1,665 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 14.3% from 147. Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 7.1% from 252.
Starspangledbanner (AUS) 16.7% · 3–18
Progeny have won 11.1% of 7,152 runs since 2008 (660 horses). Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 14.5% from 1,190.
Dandy Man (IRE) 17.6% · 3–17
Progeny have won 9.1% of 14,927 runs since 2008 (930 horses). Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 5.3% from 170.
Charming Thought (GB) 6.3% · 1–16
Progeny have won 9.4% of 1,001 runs since 2008 (75 horses).
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 22 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 3,001 · newest first

The latest 50 of 3,001 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 4 January 2005 to 21 October 2026.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
13 Oct 26 Leicester Somethingintheair (GB)J: Marco Ghiani racingtv.com Handicap StakesClass 6 · 10f · Good To Soft · 13 ran 6th 7/2J
10 Oct 26 York Loz Vegas (IRE)J: Oisin Orr Sky Bet Price Boosts Handicap Stakes (gbbplus Race)Class 4 · 10.5f · Good To Soft · 19 ran 1st 9/2J

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Peter Chapple-Hyam's strike rate?
Peter Chapple-Hyam has won 44 of 364 runners since 2022, a strike rate of 12.1% (as at 22 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Peter Chapple-Hyam do best at?
Kempton (AW) by strike rate: 2 wins from 35 runners (5.7%) since 2022. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Is Peter Chapple-Hyam in form?
Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 6 runners, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
What is Peter Chapple-Hyam's Fair A/E?
1.13, from 362 runners with a computed fair probability since 2022. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 22 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).