Stuart Williams
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 370 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 12% of them — level with the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.02). The yard is quiet just now — 0 winners in the last fortnight, below its own baseline.
The record is strongest at Brighton (20.2%, n=242), clear of the yard's 11.7% baseline. It is weakest at Nottingham (3.2% over 124 runners) — the widest gap in the record. Debutants struggle at 4.5% (n=359, Fair A/E 0.94). The market has consistently overbet new recruits from other stables on their first run: 6.4% strike, Fair A/E 0.66 and −167.25 to a £1 stake over 249 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Right now the yard is in a quiet spell: 0 from 16 runners in the last 14 days (0%, 11.7pts below the 11.7% baseline). Marco Ghiani rides 13% of the entries and edges the yard's average (14.5% vs 11.7%, A/E 1.13) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well off a 0-7-day break (21%, n=604). 12 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the totescoop6 Heritage Handicap at Ascot (Jul 2016, £62,250). The stable star of the record: Pactolus (IRE) — 14 wins from 95 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Nov–Feb.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 11.7% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 11.7% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Quiet spellWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 7,741 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 7,741 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 3 January 2005 to 24 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Stuart Williams's strike rate?
- Stuart Williams has won 827 of 7,062 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 11.7% (as at 26 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Stuart Williams do best at?
- Brighton by strike rate: 49 wins from 242 runners (20.2%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Stuart Williams?
- Marco Ghiani, with 889 runners since 2008 — 13% of the total. That pairing has won 129 (14.5%).
- Is Stuart Williams in form?
- In the last 14 days: 16 runners, 0 winners, a strike rate of 0%. That is below the baseline of 11.7% since 2008.
- What is Stuart Williams's Fair A/E?
- 1.02, from 7,027 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.