Liam McAteer
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 40 runners a season, winning with 5% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.89).
It is weakest at Leopardstown (0% over 46 runners) — the widest gap in the record. Debutants struggle at 0% (n=50, Fair A/E 0.00). The market has consistently overbet horses returning fresh after 61+ days: 1.3% strike, Fair A/E 0.33 and −133.00 to a £1 stake over 152 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Ben Curtis rides 11% of the entries and edges the yard's average (7.3% vs 4.7%, A/E 1.26) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well at trips under 6f (8.8%, n=125). The record reads poorly off a break of 180+ days — 0% over 59 runners, 4.7pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the yard over 1m – 1m1f: Fair A/E 0.20 across 124 runners (0.8% strike, −118.00 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperform what the price implies. 2 Group and Graded wins sit in the archive record — the biggest prize the yard has landed: the Irish Stallion Farms Joe McGrath European Breeders Fund Handicap at Curragh (Sep 2010, £34,450). The stable star of the record: Thats A Fret (IRE) — 9 wins from 67 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires Jul–Aug.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 4.7% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 4.7% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstCurrent form
significance-gatedLast 14 days
Small sampleWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2005→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 1,330 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 1,330 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 2 January 2005 to 20 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
Quick answers
- What is Liam McAteer's strike rate?
- Liam McAteer has won 40 of 853 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 4.7% (as at 2 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Liam McAteer do best at?
- Bellewstown by strike rate: 3 wins from 47 runners (6.4%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Liam McAteer?
- Ben Curtis, with 96 runners since 2008 — 11% of the total. That pairing has won 7 (7.3%).
- Is Liam McAteer in form?
- Too few runners in the last 14 days to read — 1 runner, which is not a sample we will draw a conclusion from.
- What is Liam McAteer's Fair A/E?
- 0.89, from 853 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.