Skip to content
Trainer profile

Luke McJannet

374 runners in the lifetime window · 73 individual horses
As at 22 Oct 2026 · KTB archive: 2005–present, updated daily
Last runner Jun 2021 99% of runners on the flat
No runners in the last 5 seasons — showing the lifetime record, from 1 Jan 2008 — the aggregate floor: every horse in the window has a complete captured career behind it.
21–374
Wins / Runs
5.6%
Strike rate
n=374
72 (19%)
Placed
0.83
n=372 · 0.70 incl. margin
−184.88
£1 level stake
n=374 at SP · −49.4%
£155k
Prize money (window)
Strike by season
3.5%
KTB Yard Profile

Sent out around 70 runners a season, almost all on the flat, winning with 6% of them — a touch below the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 0.83).

Deterministic profile computed from 374 archived runs (lifetime window) · updated 22 Oct 2026
KTB at a glance Kieran O'Neill: 6.8% from 73
The read

New recruits from other stables on their first run struggle at 2% (n=49, Fair A/E 0.49). The market has consistently overbet runners with a claiming rider up: 3.9% strike, Fair A/E 0.79 and −9.00 to a £1 stake over 102 runners — those runners underperformed what the price implied. Kieran O'Neill rode 20% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (6.8%, A/E 0.88). The yard also read well off a 0-7-day break (14.3%, n=35). The record read poorly off a 31-60-day break — 0% over 43 runners, 5.6pts below the baseline. The market has consistently overbet the yard in Class 4: Fair A/E 0.40 across 54 runners (1.9% strike, −49.00 to a £1 stake) — runners there underperformed what the price implied.

Written from the figures on this page — every claim carries its sample. Descriptive, not a tip.

Yard patterns

the angles behind the record · vs 5.6% baseline
Fresh · 61+ days off
2.7%−2.9
n=73 · A/E 0.59 · £1 −53.00
New recruits · first run for the yard
2%−3.6
n=49 · A/E 0.49 · £1 −38.00
Debutants · first career start
0%−5.6
n=25 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −25.00
First-time headgear · true-first definition
3.7%−1.9
n=27 · A/E 0.78 · £1 −23.50
Headgear returns · back on after a bare run
3.8%−1.8
n=26 · A/E 0.66 · £1 −16.00
When favourite
39.1%
n=23 · A/E 1.37 · £1 +2.12
Claiming riders · a claimer in the saddle
3.9%−1.7
n=102 · A/E 0.79 · £1 −9.00
Group / Graded races · pattern & listed
0%−5.6
n=2 · A/E 0.00 · £1 −2.00

Each tile is the record in that situation vs the 5.6% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, not tips. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races.

Notable angles

vs their own baseline
Off a 0-7-day break 14.3% vs 5.6% · n=35
Off a 31-60-day break 0% vs 5.6% · n=43
With a new jockey booking 2.5% vs 5.6% · n=203
In Class 4 1.9% vs 5.6% · n=54
With new recruits 2% vs 5.6% · n=49
Off a 61-180-day break 2.1% vs 5.6% · n=47
Descriptive splits ranked by divergence × sample — insight, not instruction. Every angle carries its N; nothing under 30 runs qualifies. Rows within 2pts of the baseline appear only when the market-relative read (Fair A/E) diverges, and show it.

Record by conditions

same window as header

Race type

TypeRWSR£1
Flat 370 21 5.7% −180.88
Hurdle 3 0 0% −3.00
NH Flat 1 0 0% −1.00

Going

GoingRWSR£1
Standard (AW) 245 14 5.7% −94.09
Good to Firm 49 3 6.1% −37.80
Good 36 1 2.8% −27.00
Good to Soft 20 0 0% −20.00
Soft 15 2 13.3% +1.44
Heavy 6 0 0% −6.00
Firm 3 1 33.3% −1.43

Courses

CourseRWSR£1
Chelmsford City (AW) 99 5 5.1% −62.00
Wolverhampton (AW) 53 4 7.5% −8.00
Kempton (AW) 39 1 2.6% −36.25
Lingfield (AW) 36 3 8.3% +20.16
Yarmouth 22 0 0% −22.00
Lingfield 18 0 0% −18.00
Newmarket 17 1 5.9% −12.00
Southwell (AW) 10 1 10% +0.00
Nottingham 9 0 0% −9.00
Leicester 8 1 12.5% −4.00
Newcastle (AW) 8 0 0% −8.00
Windsor 8 0 0% −8.00
Newmarket 5 0 0% −5.00
Brighton 5 1 20% +10.00
Bath 5 0 0% −5.00

Class

ClassRWSR£1
Class 6 178 14 7.9% −17.23
Class 5 113 4 3.5% −96.40
Class 4 54 1 1.9% −49.00
Class 3 13 0 0% −13.00
Class 7 9 2 22.2% −2.25
Class 2 5 0 0% −5.00
Class 1 2 0 0% −2.00

Market position

In the bettingRWSRA/E£1
Favourite 29 12 41.4% 1.54 +8.12
2nd–3rd fav 39 2 5.1% 0.35 −30.00
4th–6th fav 99 4 4% 0.61 −54.00
7th+ in betting 207 3 1.4% 0.58 −109.00
Fair A/E per band is the tell: near 1.00 the market had it priced right; well above, the wins came where the market didn't expect them.

Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.

Horses trained

same window as header · most-raced first
HorseRWPlLast ran
Foreign Legion (IRE)then J Larkin 18 4 6 6 Jul 19
Wild Flower (IRE)from Jimmy Fox · then Shaun Keightley 16 2 5 23 Aug 20
Bad Attitude (GB)then Alice Haynes 15 3 7 9 Jan 21
Act Of Magic (IRE)from Mohamed Moubarak · then Alice Haynes 14 0 3 24 Oct 20
Emulate Rose (GB)then Charlie Wallis 12 1 3 7 Jun 21
Thaki (IRE)then Chris Dwyer 11 0 1 25 Jun 21
Radetsky (USA)from D K Weld · then Jane Chapple-Hyam 11 2 4 17 Jun 21
Normandy Blue (GB)from Louise Allan 9 0 0 31 May 21
Daddies Diva (GB)from Rod Millman 9 0 2 11 Mar 21
Diana Lady (CHI)from Rune Haugen 9 1 1 14 Aug 18
Burguillos (GB)from John Butler 8 3 7 21 Aug 20
Showing the 60 most-raced of the 73 horses sent out in this window — each ran at least 2 times. Horses with fewer runs aren't listed; search finds any horse since 2005. Runs, wins and places only: a strike rate or a return on a handful of runs is noise, so none is quoted per horse — each horse's full record is on its own page.
Where they came from · where they went next

Of the 60 horses listed, 40 arrived from another yard in our archive, most often from Denis Quinn (2) and Jane Chapple-Hyam (2); 20 had their first archived run for this yard.

33 have since run for another yard, most often for Alice Haynes (7) and Jane Chapple-Hyam (3); 27 have no later run for another yard in our archive.

Read from each listed horse's whole archived career (2005 onwards), not only this window, and counted over the horses listed above, not the whole string. “First archived run” means our archive holds nothing earlier, not that the horse was unraced. A horse with no later run elsewhere may still be here, be off the track, or have run somewhere our archive does not cover — none of that is asserted.

When the yard fires

strike by month, lifetime
JFMAMJJASOND
184463011113336
A flat yard: the season runs Mar–Oct. Muted months are small samples (under 30 runs) — read them with the caution they deserve.

Jockey bookings

same window · biggest samples first
Go-to riderKieran O'Neill
20% of all rides
6.8% SR · A/E 0.88
RiderRWSR£1
Kieran O'Neill 73 5 6.8% −38.00
Eoin Walsh 45 3 6.7% −37.23
Muted rows are under 30 rides and sit behind "Show all".

Career highlights

lifetime archive, 2017→
21
Archived wins
£155k
Prize money
2020
Best season · 11 wins
Alnaseem (GB) — St Andrews Bureau Handicap Newmarket · Aug 2019 · Class 4
£6,469
Arabian Oasis (GB) — Mintbet.com The Home Of Refreshing Odds Handicap Southwell (AW) · Apr 2018 · Class 5
£3,752
Radetsky (USA) — Read Andrew Balding On Betway Insider Handicap Lingfield (AW) · Aug 2020 · Class 5
£3,493

Sires in the string

progeny record · win % by ground and trip
Canford Cliffs (IRE) 13% · 3–23
Progeny have won 9.8% of 5,091 runs since 2008 (314 horses). Weakest on Heavy going: 6.8% from 263.
Lope De Vega (IRE) 15.8% · 3–19
Progeny have won 13.8% of 12,160 runs since 2008 (1,100 horses). Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 9.3% from 955.
Declaration Of War (USA) 22.2% · 4–18
Progeny have won 12.3% of 1,539 runs since 2008 (123 horses). Weakest on Good to Soft going: 6% from 151.
Kodiac (GB) 5.9% · 1–17
Progeny have won 10.4% of 23,541 runs since 2008 (1,665 horses). Strongest on Firm going: 14.3% from 147. Weakest over 2m1f – 2m4f (all codes): 7.1% from 252.
Approve (IRE) 12.5% · 2–16
Progeny have won 8.3% of 2,686 runs since 2008 (179 horses). Strongest on Good going: 11.7% from 503. Strongest at trips under 6f (all codes): 11.6% from 553.
Elzaam (AUS) 0% · 0–15
Progeny have won 9.2% of 4,520 runs since 2008 (373 horses). Weakest over 1m5f – 2m (all codes): 4.6% from 324.
Top line: the yard's own record with each sire's runners (win %, wins–runs), same window as the header; faded under 30 runs. Beneath it: every run by that sire's progeny in our archive since 2008, as at 22 Oct 2026 — what they have done, not a forecast. A going or a distance is named only where at least 100 progeny runs sit 3 or more points from the sire's own win rate. Distance bands cover Flat and jumps together.

The record

latest 50 of 374 · newest first

The latest 50 of 374 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 16 February 2017 to 28 June 2021.

DateCourseHorseRaceFinishSP
07 Jun 21 Leicester Emulate Rose (GB)J: Callum Shepherd Bet At racingtv.com HandicapClass 6 · 7f · Good To Firm · 13 ran 9th 10/1
01 Jun 21 Leicester Ra Racer (GB)J: Sam Hitchcott Larsen Building Products Claiming StakesClass 5 · 7f · Good To Firm · 7 ran 5th 100/1

Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).

Quick answers

What is Luke McJannet's strike rate?
Luke McJannet has won 21 of 374 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 5.6% (as at 22 October 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
Which course does Luke McJannet do best at?
Lingfield (AW) by strike rate: 3 wins from 36 runners (8.3%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
Who rides most for Luke McJannet?
Kieran O'Neill, with 73 runners since 2008 — 20% of the total. That pairing has won 5 (6.8%).
What is Luke McJannet's Fair A/E?
0.83, from 372 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%". Three sample sizes are reported and never blended: runs (n), the ROI basis (n at SP), and the fair-A/E basis (n with a computed fair probability).

Strike rate is wins over all runs (n). ROI is £1 level stakes at SP over runs with a parseable price (n at SP). Fair A/E is wins over margin-stripped market expectation, over runs with a computed fair probability (n fair). The three Ns can legitimately differ and are always shown. Figures as at 22 October 2026, computed from our own results archive (2005 onwards; aggregates from 2008).