Alexandra Dunn
Fair A/E compares wins with a margin-stripped market expectation. Favourite-heavy samples — top yards, leading riders — naturally read a few points warm, so 1.05 means "beat the margin-free market read", not "the market underrates this by 5%".
Sends out around 140 runners a season, across both codes, winning with 8% of them — level with the margin-free market read across the lifetime window (Fair A/E 1.02). Horses with headgear back on after a bare run strike at 11% (140 runs).
The record is strongest at Fontwell (17.7%, n=96), clear of the yard's 7.5% baseline. A horse having headgear put back on after a bare run has been a positive signal at 10.7% (n=140, Fair A/E 1.55), but debutants struggle at 1.6% (n=63, Fair A/E 0.65). The market has consistently overbet new recruits from other stables on their first run: 4.1% strike, Fair A/E 0.74 and −164.87 to a £1 stake over 241 runners — those runners underperform what the price implies. Adam Wedge rides 12% of the entries and matches the yard's average almost exactly (8.2%, A/E 1.07) — the partnership beats the margin-free market read. The yard also reads well beyond 3m (18.2%, n=88) and in Chase races (12.6%, n=500). The stable star of the record: Thahab Ifraj (IRE) — 10 wins from 66 runs for the yard. Seasonally, the yard fires May–Jun.
Yard patterns
the angles behind the record · vs 7.5% baselineEach tile is the record in that situation vs the 7.5% baseline — descriptive splits with the sample always shown, for you to weigh. Tiles under 30 runs render muted. Headgear figures use the true-first definition (first gear appearance in the captured career); returns are gear back on after a bare run. Claiming riders are runs where the booked rider carried a weight claim. Group / Graded covers pattern and listed races. The same beliefs, tested across every yard and every GB and Irish race since 2005: Racing myths.
Notable angles
vs their own baselineRecord by conditions
same window as headerRace type
Going
Courses
Class
Market position
Distance
By season
Handicaps
Field size
Rows below n=30 are shown faded — a small sample is a fact, not a trend. Every figure carries its N.
Horses trained
same window as header · most-raced firstWhen the yard fires
strike by month, lifetimeJockey bookings
same window · biggest samples firstCareer highlights
lifetime archive, 2012→Sires in the string
progeny record · win % by ground and tripThe record
latest 50 of 2,638 · newest firstThe latest 50 of 2,638 archived runners, newest first. The full record runs from 1 March 2012 to 16 October 2026.
Drawn from the whole archive (2005 onwards), so it can include runs outside the window the header statistics cover. Non-runners are not listed. A finish shown in letters is a non-completion (F fell · UR unseated · PU pulled up · BD brought down).
KTB’s figures
the forward record · since 5 Oct 2026KTB’s figures on this yard’s runners since 16 Oct 2026: fastest on KTB Speed in 1 run (won 0) · to 16 Oct 2026.
Each pick was a KTB figure’s choice before the off — the published KTB Selection, the top-rated horse on KTB Rating, the fastest on KTB Speed — settled against the result the next morning and never worked out again; “did not run” is counted apart. GB and Irish races only. A record of weeks so far: read it as a count, not a verdict.
Quick answers
- What is Alexandra Dunn's strike rate?
- Alexandra Dunn has won 199 of 2,638 runners since 2008, a strike rate of 7.5% (as at 5 November 2026). Figures are computed from our own results archive.
- Which course does Alexandra Dunn do best at?
- Fontwell by strike rate: 17 wins from 96 runners (17.7%) since 2008. Read from the 15 courses with the most runners on the same basis, and only those with at least 30 — a small sample cannot top the list, and a rarely-visited course is not in the comparison.
- Who rides most for Alexandra Dunn?
- Adam Wedge, with 305 runners since 2008 — 12% of the total. That pairing has won 25 (8.2%).
- What is Alexandra Dunn's Fair A/E?
- 1.02, from 2,629 runners with a computed fair probability since 2008. Fair A/E compares actual wins with a margin-stripped market expectation, so 1.00 is par: above it the wins came at bigger prices than the margin-free market implied, below it they did not.